Service — Data Quality

Synthetic Data QA

AI-generated training data reviewed by expert humans for bias, hallucination, distribution drift, and edge-case coverage. Gartner predicts 60%+ of training data will be synthetic by 2027 — this is the trust layer it needs before it touches your model.

60%+
Gartner forecast: share of AI training data that will be synthetic by 2027
6
Quality dimensions checked: accuracy, bias, diversity, distribution, edge cases, provenance
Auto+Human
Statistical distribution analysis combined with domain expert human review
Data Card
Full provenance documentation delivered with every verified synthetic dataset
Scroll
Bias DetectionHallucination ScreeningDistribution AnalysisEdge Case CoverageData ProvenanceQuality VerificationDiversity AuditLabel AccuracyBias DetectionHallucination ScreeningDistribution AnalysisEdge Case Coverage
What It Is

Synthetic data is only as good as its verification layer

Synthetic data — training examples generated by LLMs, image generation models, or simulation engines — offers cost and scalability advantages over human-collected data. But it introduces a new set of quality risks that human-collected data does not have: systematic biases from the generator, hallucinated labels, distribution drift from real-world data, and blind spots in edge case coverage.

When you generate synthetic training pairs using GPT-4o or Claude, you inherit those models' biases, knowledge cutoff limitations, and hallucination patterns. A synthetic SFT dataset generated by an LLM will systematically underrepresent topics where the generator has poor coverage, will replicate the generator's own reasoning biases, and may contain factually incorrect examples stated with high confidence — because LLMs generate plausible text, not verified truth.

Synthetic image data from diffusion models has different but equally serious problems: generated images often fail to represent edge cases found in real-world data (unusual lighting, partial occlusions, minority class appearances), the labeling of generated images by the same model that generated them creates circular quality issues, and the domain gap between synthetic and real data is often larger than expected even when synthetic images look realistic to human observers.

Our synthetic data QA service applies a multi-layer verification approach: statistical distribution analysis compares your synthetic dataset against real-world reference distributions; automated bias detection screens for demographic, topical, and factual biases introduced by the generator; and domain-expert human review validates a sampled subset for factual accuracy, label correctness, and real-world relevance. The output is a verified, documented synthetic dataset with a full quality report and data card.

What is distribution drift in synthetic data?
Distribution drift occurs when the synthetic dataset's statistical properties differ from the real-world data your model will encounter in production. An LLM generating synthetic customer service conversations will overrepresent polite, well-formed requests (because it was RLHF-trained to prefer these) and underrepresent angry, grammatically poor, or code-switching requests that real users frequently send. A model trained on this distribution will perform worse on real users than on the synthetic benchmark.
Can we also generate synthetic data for you?
Yes. We can generate synthetic training data using LLMs (with careful prompt engineering for diversity and edge case coverage) and then run it through our expert verification layer. This gives you the cost efficiency of synthetic generation with the accuracy guarantee of human verification. We do not deliver synthetic data without human verification — the two steps are always combined in our service.
What is a data card and why do you need one?
A data card is a standardised documentation artifact describing your dataset: how it was created, what it represents, who verified it, what biases are known, what limitations apply, and what use cases it is appropriate for. For synthetic datasets specifically, the data card must document the generator model used, the generation prompts and parameters, the verification methodology, and the known gaps. Without a data card, your synthetic dataset is an undocumented risk in your training pipeline.
Synthetic Data Quality QA
✓ DIVERSITY: 9.2/10
✓ REALISM: 8.8/10
⚠ UNDER REVIEW ×12
✗ FAIL ×8
▼ BATCH QUALITY DISTRIBUTION
FAILREVIEW71% PASS ▶
✓ 71.4% PASS RATE · BATCH 18
Data Quality

Synthetic data that humans trust

AI-generated training data reviewed for bias, hallucination, distribution drift, and edge-case coverage. The trust layer that synthetic data needs to reach production.

Get a Free Audit →
Live Annotation Interface

Synthetic Data Quality Assurance Dashboard

Quality specialists evaluate synthetic data batches across diversity, realism, coherence, and training utility — filtering out low-quality generations before they enter the fine-tuning pipeline.

ConcaveLabel Studio — Synthetic QA · Project: HealthBot Training Data · Batch 18 of 24
SAMPLE ID DOMAIN DIVERSITY REALISM COHERENCE STATUS
SYN-B18-0041 Symptom Triage
9.2
8.8
9.5
PASS
SYN-B18-0042 Medication Query
5.8
8.4
6.1
REVIEW
SYN-B18-0043 Lab Result Interp.
2.8
3.4
2.2
FAIL
SYN-B18-0044 Appointment Booking
9.6
9.1
9.3
PASS
SYN-B18-0045 Emergency Triage
7.2
4.1
6.7
REVIEW
Quality Dimensions

Six dimensions we verify in every synthetic dataset

🎯
Factual Accuracy
Domain expert review of a sampled subset to verify that synthetic examples contain correct facts, accurate labels, and valid reasoning chains. Hallucinations introduced by the generator are identified and flagged. Especially critical for medical, legal, and scientific synthetic data.
Bias Audit
Statistical analysis of demographic representation, topic distribution, sentiment bias, and outcome distribution across protected categories. Detects both over-representation (the generator favoring certain groups or opinions) and under-representation (systematic blind spots).
📊
Distribution Alignment
Statistical comparison of your synthetic dataset against a real-world reference distribution (where available). Identifies topic gaps, length distribution mismatch, vocabulary drift, and instruction type imbalance. Recommendations for targeted data augmentation to close gaps.
🔲
Edge Case Coverage
Systematic check for coverage of known edge cases, minority classes, and failure-prone scenarios. LLMs tend to generate "comfortable" middle-of-the-distribution examples — we identify and flag systematic under-coverage of edge cases that your model will need to handle.
🔍
Label Accuracy
For synthetic datasets with automatic labeling (e.g., image generation with CLIP-based labeling, or instruction-response pairs labeled by the same LLM that generated them), expert human reviewers verify label correctness on a sample. Detects systematic labeling errors introduced by the generation pipeline.
📋
Data Provenance
Documentation of the complete generation methodology: model used, prompt templates, generation parameters, sampling strategy, and post-processing steps. Enables reproducibility, licensing compliance review, and future debugging when model behaviour is unexpected.
The Process

Automated analysis + domain expert review, documented end to end

01
Dataset Intake & Reference Analysis
We ingest your synthetic dataset and (where available) a reference real-world dataset for distribution comparison. Our automated analysis pipeline computes: dataset-level statistics (size, length distribution, vocabulary richness, label distribution), feature-space distance from real data (embedding-space comparison using sentence transformers or CLIP), and demographic representation metrics. This establishes the baseline before human review.
Statistical profilingEmbedding distance analysisLabel distributionReference comparison
02
Automated Bias & Anomaly Detection
Automated bias screening checks for: demographic imbalances in generated characters or scenarios, topical biases (over-representation of politically or culturally comfortable topics), sentiment biases (the generator preferring positive or agreement-heavy outputs), and structural anomalies (unusual repetition patterns, suspiciously similar examples suggesting insufficient generation diversity). All flagged items are queued for priority human review.
Demographic balance checkTopical bias detectionSentiment analysisRepetition detection
03
Domain Expert Human Review
Domain experts review a stratified sample of the dataset — typically 10–15% for large datasets, 25–30% for smaller datasets. They check: factual accuracy of claims and labels, real-world plausibility of scenarios, appropriateness of difficulty distribution, absence of harmful or offensive content, and whether the examples represent genuine user needs (not artificially simplified scenarios that real users would never create). Edge cases flagged by automation receive priority review attention.
Stratified samplingFactual accuracy checkPlausibility reviewPriority flag review
04
Report, Recommendations & Data Card
Delivery includes: a full QA report with statistical analysis results, bias findings, human review findings, and an overall dataset quality score. Specific remediation recommendations: which gaps to address with targeted additional generation, which bias patterns to correct, which examples to filter out. A complete data card for the verified dataset documenting generation methodology, verification approach, known limitations, and recommended use scope. Optionally: we can execute the remediation recommendations and run verification again.
Quality scoreRemediation recommendationsData cardOptional remediation execution
Pricing

Per-dataset
QA pricing

Priced per dataset based on size and review depth required. Includes automated analysis, domain expert human review sample, full QA report, and data card. Volume discounts for large datasets.

Request a Dataset Quote →
Small (<5K examples, 25% human review)₹2L – ₹4L
Medium (5K–50K examples, 15% review)₹4L – ₹9L
Large (>50K examples, 10% review)₹8L – ₹20L
Synthetic data generation + QA bundleCustom quote
Remediation execution (gap-filling + re-QA)+50% on base
Free audit (100 examples)₹0

Get 100 examples verified free

Send us a 100-example sample from your synthetic dataset. We will run our full QA analysis — bias check, distribution analysis, human review — and return a quality report at no cost.